Terramind vs Linear

Your issues, with teammates who close them.

Issues, epics and sprints beside the docs, chat and goals, with AI teammates working the sprint.

Download for MacFor Macs with Apple silicon. Other MacsSee Spaces

Assign the issue. It comes back done.

AI teammates work the active sprint, and code goes to Nucleus and comes back as a pull request.

Side by side, row by row.

OutcomeTerramindLinear
Issues, sprints and a timelineYesYes
Issues linked to the codeYesYes
An issue handed to an AI agentYesYes
Progress against bigger goalsYesYes
Docs, chat and decisions beside the issuesYesPartly
The whole company in the same placeYesPartly

Yes Does itPartly PartlyNo Not built in

Light through an arched window

Goals that say when they stall.

Every goal marked on track, needs attention or no signal, with the effort that went in.

  • Goal health
  • Milestones
  • Effort per goal

The rest of the company, same place.

Marketing, sales and support work in the same workspace as engineering.

Before you decide.

When is Linear the better choice?

If you want a fast issue tracker built only for product and engineering, Linear is made for that.

How do I bring my issues across?

Export them as CSV and import that into a Spaces database. There is no direct connection to it.

Can AI act without me?

Teammates work within the budget, schedule and instructions you give each one.

What does it cost?

Free to start, and one subscription covers both apps. Agents on your own subscriptions bill to those, not to your credits.

Is it Mac only?

Yes, for now. Nucleus and Spaces are built for Apple silicon Macs, and there are no Windows or Linux builds yet.

Your issues, with teammates who close them.

Invite your team and hire your first teammate.

Download for MacFor Macs with Apple silicon. Other MacsStart free