Parallel agents, and the whole sprint.
Hand a set of Spaces issues to parallel agents and get reviewed pull requests back.
Claude Code and Codex run on the accounts you already have.
Issues in. Pull requests out.
Pick issues in Spaces, send them out together, and each comes back as a pull request.
Side by side, row by row.
| Outcome | Terramind | Conductor |
|---|---|---|
| Coding agents in parallel, a worktree each | Yes | Yes |
| Claude Code and Codex on your own plans | Yes | Yes |
| A Mac app | Yes | Yes |
| Your team's decisions and goals as context | Yes | No |
| Decks, spreadsheets, video and research | Yes | No |
Yes Does itPartly PartlyNo Not built in
Every PR checked and clicked through.
Line comments, fixes applied, and the built-in browser recording the change working.
- Line comments
- Fixes applied
- Recorded in browser
The work around the code, too.
Release notes, the launch deck and the analysis come out of the same app.
Before you decide.
When is Conductor enough?
If you only need parallel coding agents on a repo, it covers that well.
Which agents run in Nucleus?
Claude Code, Codex, Grok and the Terramind agent, picked per chat.
Does my code leave my machine?
Your repo and worktrees stay on your Mac. Cloud runs upload the work only when you start one.
What does it cost?
Free to start, and one subscription covers both apps. Agents on your own subscriptions bill to those, not to your credits.
Is it Mac only?
Yes, for now. Nucleus and Spaces are built for Apple silicon Macs, and there are no Windows or Linux builds yet.
Parallel agents, and the whole sprint.
Works with the Claude Code and Codex accounts you already have.