NucleusGreptile comments after the push. Nucleus catches it before.
Don't make your mistakes in public. The fastest fix is the one you haven't pushed yet — same class of catch, in the editor at the diff, plus a repo-wide security audit and the agent that wrote the code. A self-improving codebase, on one bill.
Greptile comments after the push. Nucleus catches the same class of bug before the commit — and ships the agent that wrote the code, a repo-wide audit, and outcome automations on one bill.
Same bill. Whole stack.
One bill. Three reasons.
Greptile bills $1 per review past 50. Nucleus has no cap.
At 200 PRs/mo, Greptile is $30 base + 150 × $1 = $180/seat. Add an IDE (Cursor $20), a SAST scanner (Snyk $25), and an asset generator (Midjourney $30) — ~$255/dev/mo and balloons into the $1,000s once real usage kicks in. Nucleus plugs into the Claude or ChatGPT sub you already pay; that subsidy carries the inference straight through — no markup, no per-token tax. Nucleus Team is a flat $50/seat — the bill is the same whether you review 50 or 500.
AI ships 10× faster. And 10× more vulnerabilities.
AI codegen has us shipping 10× faster — and quietly producing 10× more vulnerabilities. Greptile is one layer — PR review. Nucleus adds two more — a multi-stage security review across the whole repo, plus an in-app review as you write.
Self-improving. Any event in. Any output out.
A trigger fires — a PR opens, a Sentry spike, a 9 a.m. cron. A Nucleus agent spins up in a cloud sandbox, works the brief, and an output lands. Greptile reviews PRs — that's the surface. Nucleus wires events to outcomes across six trigger surfaces and six output channels — and the coding agent lives in the same shell as the reviewer.
One Subscription. Self Improving Codebase.
Who switches, honestly.
Stay on Greptile if review on the PR is the entire job, you qualify for the free OSS tier, or graph-indexed cross-file context is the exact wedge.
Switch to Nucleus if
- you're hitting the 50-review cap
- you want the catch pre-commit
- you want a repo-wide audit
- you want the reviewer and the coding agent on one bill
- or you want 50+ models across 10+ providers powering the review
every new frontier release stays inside the same subscription instead of forcing a model switch.
Having the full stack in one place, compounds.